First Presidential Veto
On April 5, 1792, George Washington used the first presidential veto in our country’s history. It was to turn down a bill that he felt unconstitutionally gave some states more members in the House of Representatives than the Constitution would allow.
The US Constitution stated that the number of seats in the House of Representatives should be decided after a census of the state populations was made within three years of Congress’s first meeting. The first census was taken in 1790. According to the Constitution the appropriation of seats would be based on the population of each state, and that each state would get at least one representative.
The bill stated that the total number of representatives would be 120, and that the number of representatives per state would be decided by dividing the population by 30,000. However, eight of the states that had a large fraction left over after this division each received one additional representative. The bill passed the House on February 12, 1792, and the Senate on March 12. It was then submitted to President Washington for his approval.
Washington turned to his advisors for their opinions on the bill. Edmund Randolph and Thomas Jefferson believed the bill was unconstitutional. They argued against the number of representatives it established and also that the additional members added to eight states was “repugnant to the spirit of the Constitution.” Henry Knox and Alexander Hamilton supported the bill’s approval. They argued that the Constitution was unclear about “whether the numbers of representatives shall be apportioned on the aggregate number of all people in the United States, or on the aggregate numbers of the people of each state.”
Washington considered both sides, but ultimately sided with Jefferson and Randolph and issued the first presidential veto in US history on April 5, 1792. In his response, Washington stated that “there is no one proportion or divisor which, applied to the respective numbers of the States will yield the number and allotment of representatives proposed by the Bill… [and] the bill has allotted to eight of the States more than one [representative] for thirty thousand.”
Congress attempted to override Washington’s veto but didn’t get the two-thirds vote they needed. So, they wrote a new bill that would establish the House on “the ratio of one for every thirty-three thousand persons in the respective States.” Additionally, any fractional remainders wouldn’t add to the number of representatives for any state. The bill passed the House and Senate on April 10 and Washington signed it into law on April 14.
Washington would only use his veto power one more time during his presidency. In 1797, he vetoed an act that called to reduce the number of cavalry units in the army.
To date, America’s presidents have issued over 2,500 vetoes. Franklin Roosevelt had the most with 635. Seven presidents never vetoed a bill. And 112 presidential vetoes have been overridden.
You can discover more about presidential vetoes, including all the vetoes issued by every president to date here.
|FREE printable This Day in History album pages
Download a PDF of today’s article.
Get a binder or other supplies to create your This Day in History album.
Discover what else happened on This Day in History.
3 responses to "First Presidential Veto"
3 thoughts on “First Presidential Veto”
Fascinating data. With the number of vetoes overridden and 7 presidents never vetoing a bill. High School was a long time ago, haha, so I am not sure if this was even discussed in American History. Time to google to find who did and didn’t.
Particularly interesting article. I had no idea about Washington’s vetoes. I appreciate all the history I have learned from your articles. One of my sons has a History degree and is currently in the Air Force and stationed at Elmendorf near Anchorage, Alaska. After I read your articles, I quiz my son on the contents via text or phone call. I am very pleased that he is serving our country but of course we miss him and this is a fun and learning wonderful way we stay connected. So, again, I really appreciate the articles!
Wished I had paid more attention to the history teacher way back when! I find myself really enjoying these history lessons and they go with the stamps too. Thanks again.